eblast popup

Aviation Safety
RSS / XML

Home
Get Web Access Now
Get Web Access Now
Start a Subscription
Purchase Back Articles
Aviation Safety Related Articles
Aviation Books & Tapes
In Future Issues
Search
Aviation Web Directory
Customer Service
Government
Weather
Flight Planning Tools
General
Aircraft
Magazines
Books & Tapes
Organizations

AVweb RSS

Many of the charts & tables found on this site are PDFs.
Download Acrobat Reader

Publishing Systems Powered by iProduction


AVweb.com | FAA NOTAM's page | FAA AD's page | NOAA Aviation Weather page

Flying Below Minimum Altitudes
It’s nearing dusk as two Piper Senecas descend toward Highfuelprices Regional Airport on vectors for the VOR approach. Published minimums are 500 and 1. The airport has weather reporting and forecasting, the airplanes have the same avionics. Seneca A is being flown by a pilot with commercial, instrument and multi-engine ratings and a current Part 135 approval; the flight is being operated under Part 135 as there is a five-pound box of urgent documents under the cargo net behind the rear seats. Meanwhile, Seneca B is being flown by a pilot with commercial, instrument and multi-engine ratings, a 23-month-old flight review and some question as to whether he is instrument-current. It is a Part 91 flight. There are four passengers on board who are splitting the cost of the flight with the pilot. Before they reach the final approach fix, the controller advises both aircraft that the airport weather is now 400 overcast and ¾ mile visibility in rain and mist. Seneca A pilot advises the controller she cannot continue the approach and that she’d like to climb 1000 feet or so and hold at the FAF while she decides whether to go to her alternate or wait for the weather to improve. The pilot of Seneca B hears the weather report and continues with the approach because he wants to take a look.

Wind Gusts Effect on Airframes and Airspeeds
Comanche seven-three Papa, Wichita approach; winds two-zero-zero degrees at one-eight, gusts to 30." "Approach, seven-three Pop; copy the winds...guess we’ll keep up the pace a bit." "Comanche Seven-Three Papa, Dorothy says, ‘Welcome to Kansas.’" When first sitting down to assemble this article, my initial thoughts turned to my logbook. Inside it are more than a few notations about such not-unusual days; the controller’s welcome in this one made me chuckle. At almost the same instant, the sound of 30-knot gusts rattling the trees outside my office focused my attention on the day’s local conditions—an environment offering abundant signs that any flying means dealing with gusts. My familiarity with gusty conditions started developing during my primary training. A regular part of my time-building solo practice involved August afternoons hopping among five Wichita-area fields. Typically, those hot summer days and nights brought winds blowing hard, in the teens to low 20s, and usually gusty—as much as 20 knots above the mean. For much of that month gusty winds served up a significant challenge for a student pilot armed only with a Cherokee 140 and determination. Hey, it’s Kansas.

Proper Maintenance of Your Aircraft
We all have had a life experience or two in which we "should have known" about the results of a decision and could kick ourselves for not heeding our instincts. When it comes to flying safely, the need to follow those internal alarms is all the more important. For example, there is a big difference between instrument flying where we need to faithfully heed the data on the panel in spite of our inner ear sensations and the attention we should pay to our "sixth sense" of self-preservation when we get hints from the aircraft systems that something isn’t right. We often fly with other pilots and, depending on our role in the cockpit, we may notice more or less about the aircraft or environment. When a system offers up a hint, we analyze it and take some action, but do we take enough action or give enough credence to our sixth sense of feelings about the potential impact on the flight? Can that inner warning be "waived off" by a casual remark from the other pilot or a controller? Let’s look at some instances and examples.

Flying in High-Density Altitude Conditions
It happens every summer. Temperatures rise and with them so does density altitude. It may seem we should simply avoid flying when the density altitude (DA) creeps up, but this would be very short-sighted—although there are some hazards warranting a delay when the air heats up (thunderstorms and desert turbulence among them), the fact is we can safely fly in most high-density-altitude conditions. Doing it, however, requires some technique and some compromise. We all learned the basics of density altitude when we first learned to fly. But what are the practical techniques necessary to maximize airplane—and pilot—performance when hot and high? And when do we need to employ them? What is high density altitude? It’s really a function of the airplane’s capabilities...and those of the pilot. You’ll find Piper Cubs and Cessna 150s flying out of Leadville, Colo., (elevation 9927 feet msl), yet hear of DA-related accidents involving much more powerful airplanes at much lower altitudes. Air density increases to "high" levels in summer’s heat, even at relatively low-altitude airports. When you consider that maximum available power drops by about 10 percent for every 3000 feet of density altitude increase above sea level (in naturally aspirated engines), even flat-land flyers need to compensate for power lost due to high DA in summer.

Are Some FAA Flight Regulations To Lax?
There’s no way the FAA can come up with a regulation covering every possible scenario, which is a good thing. If they did, we’d rarely be able to roll our airplanes out of their hangars except on the clearest of days when no airliners were about. So, the FARs set certain minimum standards for pilots and once we determine we’re in compliance, it’s up to us to decide if the proposed operation is safe, morally acceptable and non-fattening. Or something like that. Frequently what we want to do complies with both the FARs’ letter and spirit. Sometimes it’s borderline; certainly legal but safe only if everything goes our way and nothing on the airplane breaks. And then, there are occasions when the proposed operation is both legal but really not smart.

Taking Off Into Inclement Weather
Way back in the bad old days when I had just a few hundred hours of flight time, I recall how I would get quite obnoxious during my preflight preparations. (Of course, some say I still am, regardless of when I might be flying next, but that’s only because I know what they don’t.) The challenge of herding all the cats necessary for a safe departure sometimes made for brusque conversation with me. Get over it. These days, I’m more laid back before departing, at least outwardly. I’m still running through a mental checklist, though, and trying to make sure everything gets done in a logical order. I’ve also come to grips with what was driving my concerns: a misplaced belief that filing for, say, a noon departure meant advancing the throttle no later than 11:59. No exceptions. So, I readily understand how anxious some pilots can get when preparing to depart. Add in various external challenges from business and personal lives, passengers who need to be at the destination by a certain time and the peer pressure of other airplanes coming and going seemingly without problems, and the physical and mental effort of actually flying an airplane can seem like a vacation.


FREE ONLINE ACCESS!

SUBSCRIBE NOW!
Get FREE Online Access to all of Aviation Safety, including all back articles!


First Name:
Last Name:
Address 1:
Address 2:
City:
State:          Zip:
Email:

About Us / Contact Us / Privacy Policy / Site Map
Copyright Belvoir Media Group, LLC. All rights reserved.